The Money Masters (Part 10 of 22)

The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole…Their secret is that they have annexed from governments, monarchies, and republics the power to create the world’s money…” THE MONEY MASTERS is a 3 1/2 hour non-fiction, historical documentary that traces the origins of the political power structure that rules our nation and the world today. The modern political power structure has its roots in the hidden manipulation and accumulation of gold and other forms of money. The development of fractional reserve banking practices in the 17th century brought to a cunning sophistication the secret techniques initially used by goldsmiths fraudulently to accumulate wealth. With the formation of the privately-owned Bank of England in 1694, the yoke of economic slavery to a privately-owned “central” bank was first forced upon the backs of an entire nation, not removed but only made heavier with the passing of the three centuries to our day. Nation after nation, including America, has fallen prey to this cabal of international central bankers. Segments: The Problem; The Money Changers; Roman Empire; The Goldsmiths of Medieval England; Tally Sticks; The Bank of England; The Rise of the Rothschilds; The American Revolution; The Bank of North America; The Constitutional Convention; First Bank of the U.S.; Napoleon’s Rise to Power; Death of the First Bank of the U.S. / War of 1812; Waterloo; Second Bank of the U.S.; Andrew Jackson; Fort Knox; World Central Bank

Duration : 0:9:48


[youtube Pyaj30n8kZY]

25 Responses to “The Money Masters (Part 10 of 22)”

  1. @rcezaire01 Exactly …
    @rcezaire01 Exactly, don’t blame the Rothchilds. I’m pretty sure if it was anyone else they would manipulate the system for their familes personal gain.

    To stop it is going to be a hard, long process, they have puppets working for them throughout the wealthiest governments across the world.

  2. Ron Paul 2012 !!!!! …
    Ron Paul 2012 !!!!!!!!

  3. brianmenendez on May 7th, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    seems like a lot of …
    seems like a lot of our good presidents are assasinated

  4. He looks like a …
    He looks like a young Matt Lesko minus the crazy suit and crack

  5. These international …
    These international bankers have been around for a long time. They will always be here no matter what people do. Humans are greedy and selfish. If it wasn’t those bankers, it would be some other assholes. Only thing we can do is change the way we live. People spend money on the stupidest things.

  6. To be clear. I did …
    To be clear. I did not mean to pick on the people of any nation. Most people are totally in the dark or they would revolt in the streets if they had the knowledge and the balls.

  7. That is correct. …
    That is correct. Too often the people of the U.K. get blinded by the elite of the country as they do in other parts of the world. The bankers are the main problem but also is an uneducated serf like electorate. The U.S. is no better.

  8. The UK has nothing …
    The UK has nothing to do with it, its the bankers

  9. HeadoftheHydra on May 7th, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    The Rothchilds may …
    The Rothchilds may do as they please. They’re fooling no one: We all know they have very, VERY tiny penises.

  10. This should be …
    This should be required viewing in every University in the U.S.

    Fuck England…..the U.K. Elite suck the of the Rothchilds…..but there are others like the Rockefellers and agents like Henry A. Kissinger.

    Go to F.R.E.E. The Fund To Restore an Educated Electorate.

    How stupid most people are! How resistant to fact and knowledge but they know all about Tiger Woods! The masses are asses!

  11. VegitoVai90 on May 7th, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    That’s it, BURN THE …
    That’s it, BURN THE ROTHSCHILDS

  12. onlyafool1611 on May 7th, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    very well said …
    very well said flyspeck40

  13. silly bickering is …
    silly bickering is why peeps can’t get together and DO anything about the main problem.

  14. If you don’t trust …
    If you don’t trust the inflation calculator I gave,you could use another one:
    westegg (dot)com (/)inflation
    It gives a very close figure.
    So,my point is you said they just compared the money per capita between 1866 and 1886 without looking at the purchase power of the dollar and you were right.
    But, even with that considered one is poorer almost 4.5 times in 1886 than 1866 as my calc shows. I stand by my calc, please feel free to check my numbers for yourself.

  15. $50.46 (money per …
    $50.46 (money per capita in 1866) divided by $6.67 (same in 1886) gives 7.56 times poorer, but this would not be accurate as it doesnt include the price deflation from 1866 to 1886. The correct figure is therefore 4.48.
    In other words, the purchase power of 1 buck increased 68.75% from 1866 to 1886; the money supply contraction to create this increase in the buying power is only 40.74%. But the contraction was 86.78%!!! (from $50.46 to $6.67).
    I will let my numbers speak for themselves.

  16. Go to: …
    Go to: measuringworth(dot) com(/) ppowerus
    to use the PRICE inflation calculator:
    $50.46 (money per capita in 1866) has the same purchase power as $29.90 in 1886.
    So, one needed $29.90 in 1886 to buy exactly same things he could buy with $50.46 in 1866, but he has only $6.67 in 1886 (money per capita in 1886). So one is poorer 4.48 times in 1886 than 1866 (29.9 divided by 6.67). This includes the PRICE deflation that took place from 1866 to 1886.

  17. chainzdown2dadik on May 7th, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    what the are …
    what the are you talking about.? how the was there inflation if the country went from $50 per capita to $6 per capita? inflation is an INCREASE in the money supply you dumb ass. and it’s funny that you would call my “hypothetical situation” a half truth. after watching the video again after an entire month i realized that my numbers weren’t hypothetical and were actually derived from the video. so i think it’s you with the attention deficit, you should have been able to point that out.

  18. 1.They are talking …
    1.They are talking about real numbers with backed up data. So,please don’t bring your half-truth hypothetical situations here.
    2.I know what deflation is,from 1866 to 1888,economy constantly DETERIORATED(meaning inflation,I guess you missed that too)!So how the deflation of more than 50% could take place from $14 to $6 per capita in that 11 years when there was inflation?
    3.You go educate yourself first,but first you need to clear that attention deficit to listen more carefully.

  19. chainzdown2dadik on May 7th, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    first of all you …
    first of all you idiot the “$50 to $6″ comment was intended as a hypothetical situation. second, you moron, it is very possible for $6 one year to be more valuable than $14 was eleven years prior. it’s called deflation, which can be caused by either a contraction in the money supply or by a growing economy, provided the money does not expand, or at least not at as fast a rate as the economy. next time make sure you know what the you’re talking about before you make stupid responses.

  20. Chainzdown, who …
    Chainzdown, who said $6 got people through when the money supply was $6 per capita?I guess you didn’t watch the rest of part 10 after that. In fact, if you were careful enough, in 1888, it was $6, the RIOTS started in 1877 when it was around $14. So when $14 wasn’t enough, how would $6, 11 years later would be enough. Maybe you should get a better understanding of economics, also watch the whole thing very carefully before rushing to post your very stupid and ignorant remark.

  21. chainzdown2dadik on May 7th, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    in a free market …
    in a free market economy where NO ONE has monopoly of the money supply recessions are very possible. and the problem isn’t gold, the problem is in fact monopoly over the money supply whether it is the government or a private central bank.

    and deflation means that the money has more not less buying power, just less money per capita. going from having $50 to $6 doesn’t hurt if it can get you the same thing. the creators of this film clearly have limited understanding of economics.

  22. I don’t agree with …
    I don’t agree with the makers of this movie that a gold standard is bad for the people. If a currency is backed 100% by gold (and silver, if that’s needed), the power of printing more money and contracting it, disapears. That’s the whole point. No one should have that power to control a nations’ money supply, because it causes transer of wealth from the poor to the rich (in times of printing/inflation) or a depression (in times of contracting).

  23. digitalgateway5 on May 7th, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    No clearasvodka – …
    No clearasvodka – in the scriptures it stated by The Most High Power God that GOLD and SILVER is lawful money on a whole and usary is unlawful i.e. interest! Where in the in history has some paper receipts i.e.( FRN’s) and wood has been used as lawful money according to the good book i.e. Bible?!, Oh I though this country was a God earing Nation! Anybody with a brain in thier head knows that gold and silver is the standard for money and precious metals and substance!

  24. the real rulers are …
    the real rulers are always in the background they work like shadows and work through their puppets they are rothschild oppenheimer warberg and others

  25. clearasvodka on May 7th, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    Gold is for Kings. …
    Gold is for Kings. Silver is for the People. Fiat currency is destroying America. Buy silver to combat inflation and money manipulation by banks.

Leave a Reply